Supreme Court Upholds Advance Reservation: Justice Ravindra Bhat Delivered A Dissenting Judgment That The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Violates The Concept Of Equality: Supreme Court upholds advance reservation. Chief Justice U.U. Four judges in the five-judge constitution bench, which included Lalit, upheld reservation and the 103rd constitutional amendment.

The bench observed that reservation for the economically backward among the progressives is constitutional. The bench passed four judgments on the reservation issue.

The Supreme Court passed a decisive verdict while considering a petition challenging the provision of 10 percent reservation to the economically backward classes.

It was a short time ago that a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court started pronouncing its judgment to decide whether or not the advance reservation is constitutional.

Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Bela Trivedi, who first delivered the judgment, upheld the government’s decision to impose reservation. Justice Bela Trivedi observed that economic reservation is neither unconstitutional nor discriminatory.

Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Bela Trivedi observed that the exclusion of Backward Classes is not unconstitutional and recognizes the exclusion of existing reservations.

But Justice Ravindra Bhat gave a different verdict. In his judgment, Justice Ravindra Bhat said that he did not disagree with the economic reservation, but he disagreed with the exclusion of those who are currently receiving reservations.

Justice Ravindra Bhat said that the 103rd Constitutional Amendment violates the concept of equality and it is not right to exclude the backward people who currently get reservations.

The bench also observed that it is time to consider changes in the reservation system.

Chief Justice U.U. Today, Lalit’s last working day, the verdict was announced. The judgment started at 10.30 am today on the petitions challenging the constitutional amendment allowing 10 percent advance reservation in the employment and education sector.

The 103rd amendment to the constitution was introduced to provide reservation to the economically backward classes. Petitions have reached the court against this.

The bench examined whether the 103rd Amendment on Prior Reservation changes the basic structure of the Constitution.

In January 2019, the court heard 39 petitions filed against the provision of 10 percent reservation to economically backward classes in educational institutions and government jobs

Follow For More Interesting Article At LatestSerialGossip.Com


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here